Tag Archives: v3.inv
Another look at NASA Gistemp
Publishing this post now in advance of completion to have it available in another post. More details of the companion KML file to be added. I started this blog in 2010, discussing shortcomings in the station location metadata used in … Continue reading
GHCN and Gistemp Data Quality
Post to be completed when the post Self-adjusting the Adjustments is complete. Posted now as placeholder to allow linkage from previous post. Location metadata Temperature data
Urban corrections in Gistemp (and GHCN-M), “then and now”
Further content coming soon. This placeholder post published now to allow a link to the coming post to be included in an online comment. Hansen et al. 1999 (Hansen, J., R. Ruedy, J. Glascoe, and M. Sato, 1999: GISS analysis … Continue reading
Temperature Adjustments In The Canadian Arctic – some supplementary information for a comment
This post extends a comment posted at https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/08/temperature-adjustments-in-the-canadian-arctic/ While Paul Homewood’s post deals with GHCN adjustments, this comment examines the influence of one of these Canadian Arctic stations, Eureka, on the Gistemp gridded output. As station coverage in the northern … Continue reading
Cooling The Past In Siberia – some supplementary information – the discussion
As completion of this post was long delayed, I’m posting the discussion part separately here as an ‘aside’ post so that it will show up as a new post for anyone who has given up waiting. The most striking aspect … Continue reading
Cooling The Past In Siberia – some supplementary information
Paul Homewood has a post Cooling The Past In Siberia , where I commented. This post adds some further information to my comments, with images which I could not post inline at Paul’s blog, and more detailed information about the … Continue reading
A few more GHCN problems
GHCN monthly data (v2 or v3) may not always be quite what it seems. Consider Nitchequon (Canada: 40371826000), looking here at the five individual time series in GHCN v2: Some missing years – but where’s the problem?
